dbjxdz能不能停止污染语言啊啊啊啊啊

etymonline原文如下
late 14c., "relation of incidents" (true or false), from Old French?estoire,?estorie?"story; chronicle, history" (12c., Modern French?histoire), from Latin?historia?"narrative of past events, account, tale, story," from Greek?historia?"a learning or knowing by inquiry; an account of one's inquiries; knowledge, account, historical account, record, narrative," from?historein?"be witness or expert; give testimony, recount; find out, search, inquire," and?histōr?"knowing, expert; witness," both ultimately from PIE?*wid-tor-, from root?*weid-?"to see," hence "to know."
Thus it is related etymologically to Greek?idein?"to see,"?eidenai?"to know," and to?idea?and?vision. Beekes writes of?histōr?that "The word itself, but especially the derivations ... that arose in Ionic, have spread over the Hellenic and Hellenistic world together with Ionic science and philosophy."?
In Middle English it was not differentiated from?story?(n.1); the sense of "narrative record of past events" probably is first attested late 15c. The modern meaning "recorded events of the past" is from late 15c., as is use of the word in reference to a branch of knowledge. The meaning "a historical play or drama" is from 1590s.
The sense of "systematic account (without reference to time) of a set of natural phenomena" (1560s) is now obsolete except in?natural history?(as late as the 1880s published county histories in the U.S. routinely included natural history chapters, with lists of birds and fishes and illustrations of local slugs and freshwater clams). The meaning "an eventful career, a past worthy of note" (a woman with a history) is from 1852. To?make history?"be notably engaged in public events" is from 1862.
History is the interpretation of the significance that the past has for us. [Johan Huizinga, "The Task of the Cultural Historian"]
History is more or less bunk [Henry Ford, Chicago Tribune, May 25, 1916]
One difference between history and imaginative literature ... is that history neither anticipates nor satisfies our curiosity, whereas literature does. [Guy Davenport, "Wheel Ruts," 1996]